I. The Crusades
A. Calling the Crusade
1. The Turkish Invasion and the Byzantine Empire — The
Crusades brought together the traditions of pilgrimage and holy war and
established a European presence in the Middle East that lasted for two
centuries. The First Crusade was called in response to the Byzantine emperor’s
request for help against a new wave of Muslim invasions by the Sunni Seljuk
Turks. Taking advantage of the weakness of the Muslim world, by 1050 the
Seljuks had conquered Baghdad and begun to attack Byzantine territory. At the
battle of Manzikert, a mercenary imperial army was defeated and the Byzantine
emperor Romanus was captured. The Turks then swept across the Middle East and
took Jerusalem from its Fatimid rulers. In 1095, the Byzantine emperor Alexius
I (Alexius Comnenus) appealed to Pope Urban II for help, hoping to get new
mercenary troops for a fresh offensive.
2. Pope Urban II and the Calling of the First Crusade — In
response, Pope Urban II (r. 1088–1099) called upon a wide range of Christians
to take up arms and reclaim the Holy Land from “the wicked race.” He offered
indulgences to those willing to respond to his call. Historians are divided
about his goals, but certainly he hoped to increase the power of the papacy and
organize the entire “race of Franks” into a peace militia dedicated to Holy
purposes, an Army of God. Urban’s call gave the papacy a new role in military
matters. Between 60,000 and 100,000 people undertook the journey to fight for
the Holy Land, motivated by a mix of piety and the desire to gain land. Many
women, children, and old men participated in the First Crusade.
B. The First Crusade
1. The People’s Crusade and Attacks on Jews — The armies of
the First Crusade were not an organized military force but a series of separate
militias. One band, made up of a number of loosely affiliated armed commoners
led by Peter the Hermit (The People’s Crusade) departed early, inspired by
fiery and charismatic orators. On its way to the Holy Land, the band made a
deliberate detour to the Rhineland, where they attacked Jewish communities in a
series of pogroms, killing hundreds. The members of the People’s Crusade who
eventually made it to the Holy Land were shipped off to Asia, where most died.
2. Taking the Holy Land — The main crusader armies arrived
in autumn, and after much squabbling eventually promised the Byzantine emperor
Alexius they would return any land they conquered to him. On June 18, 1097,
they took Nicaea and dutifully handed it over to Alexius. However, they would
not keep their promise for long. When one group took the city of Edessa, they
created the first of the crusader states. The main body of crusaders eventually
defeated a Turkish army at Antioch after an eight-month siege.
3. Taking Jerusalem — From Antioch the crusaders planned to
capture Jerusalem, but disputes and divisions delayed their efforts. Divisions
among the Muslims finally gave the crusaders the chance to attack Jerusalem,
and they captured the city in July 1099, slaughtering much of the population.
C. The Crusader States
1. The Crusader Lordships — The victorious leaders of the
First Crusade retained the lands they had conquered and established lordships,
in which lords extended fiefs to their vassals. When most of the crusaders went
home, the rulers who remained built castles, worked with the mixed indigenous
population, and encouraged trade to flourish.
2. The Knights Templar — A new militant monasticism took
root in the form of the Knights Templar, who took vows of chastity and
obedience and promised to protect pilgrims. Named for their living quarters in
the area near the former Jewish temple at Jerusalem, the order of the Knights
Templar protected pilgrimage routes from Palestine to Jerusalem, manned town
garrisons of the crusader states, and transported money from Europe to the Holy
Land. They became wealthy and powerful and established branches across Europe.
D. The Disastrous Second Crusade
1. The Monarchies and the Second Crusade — The Seljuk Turks
retook Edessa in 1144. In response, Pope Eugenius III (r. 1145–1153) called a
second crusade, attracting the monarchs Louis VII of France and Conrad III of
Germany to the cause. Eugenius and the charismatic and influential Cistercian
abbot St. Bernard attempted to launch crusades within Europe, encouraging
German nobles to focus not on the Holy Land but on conquering the pagans on the
Baltic coast, and on trying to support Alfonso VI of Castile’s reconquista
of Spain.
2. The Failed Crusade — The Second Crusade was poorly
planned, and Conrad and Louis failed to coordinate with each other and with the
crusader states. They were badly hurt by Turkish attacks, and in July 1148 they
attacked Damascus but failed to take it, suffering heavy casualties. In the
aftermath of the failed crusade, Louis VII divorced Eleanor of Aquitane for
infidelity, and their marriage was annulled. Eleanor was remarried to Henry,
count of Anjou, who became King Henry II of England in 1154.
E. The Long-Term Impact of the Crusades
1. The End of the Crusader States — Despite eight major
crusades between 1096 and the end of the thirteenth century, the crusader
states fell to the Muslims in 1291. Europeans never committed the resources
necessary to preserve them.
2. Economic Consequences — The crusades stimulated trade and
created more modern taxation systems, while they also sparked new notions of
expedition and exploration, such as Columbus’s journey.
3. Islamic Disunity — The crusades worsened, but did not
create Islamic disunity. The brutality of the crusades shocked Muslims, who
before the crusades had experienced more serious divisions between Sunni and
Shi‘ite than between Muslims and Christians.
II. The Revival of Monarchies
A. Reconstructing the Empire at Byzantium
1. The Reign of Alexius Comnenus — The Byzantine emperor
Alexius Comnenus was an upstart from a dynatoi family who rose to become
emperor during difficult times. Under attack from Normans in Italy, Seljuk
Turks in Asia Minor, and new groups in the Balkans, Alexius was able to avoid
defeat by turning his enemies against one another.
2. The Emperor and the Nobility — To fight his wars, Alexius
relied on mercenaries and allied dynatoi families, who were armed and mounted
like European knights and accompanied by their own troops. In exchange, he paid
the aristocracy with land and the urban elite with offices, while working
closely with the church. This arrangement made the empire stronger militarily,
but it weakened the emperor’s individual power relative to the nobility.
B. England under Norman Rule
1. The Norman Invasion, 1066 — When the Anglo-Saxon king
Edward the Confessor (r. 1042–1066) died childless, there were three claimants
to the English throne, including Harold, earl of Wessex; Harald, king of
Norway; and William, duke of Normandy. William claimed Edward had promised him
the throne, but Edward’s nomination on his deathbed of Harold was confirmed by
the royal advisory committee. After Harold was crowned, William invaded England
with the pope’s support. Harold, who had just defeated Harald, marched 250
miles to meet William. They fought the battle of Hastings on October 14, 1066.
William’s archers helped him to kill Harold and defeat his army. William’s
subjugation of England involved an attempt to replace instead of assimilate the
Anglo-Saxon nobility. As much as one in five English people died in the
conquest and its immediate aftermath.
2. Institutions of Norman Kingship — The Normans retained
many Anglo-Saxon institutions and procedures, such as writs to communicate the
king’s orders and administrative divisions, including shires. But William
treated England as conquered booty, keeping 20 percent of the land for himself
and dividing the rest as scattered fiefdoms to family members, barons, and
others, who in turn distributed it to their vassals. All owed the king dues and
military service.
3. Domesday — In 1086, William ordered a survey and census
called Domesday, which included an extensive inventory of England’s land,
livestock, taxes, and population. Working from Anglo-Saxon tax lists and with
local jurors, detailed inquests provided a complete picture of England’s
resources.
4. England and the Continent — The Norman conquest connected
England closely to the continent’s languages, culture, politics, and
institutions. English wool was widely traded on the continent, and the barons
of England kept their estates in Normandy, while England’s Norman monarchs
spent long periods on the continent
C. Praising the King of France
1. Suger and Louis VI — The less powerful French monarchy
also took part in a revival during the reign of Louis VI, or Louis the Fat (r.
1108–1137). Supported by an able propagandist, Suger, the abbot of Saint-Denis,
Louis was promoted as another Charlemagne, a ruler for all society and a
protector of the church. As his biographer, Suger promoted Louis as an ally of
the pope and a pious and active defender of the faith. Louis made the most of
the king’s right to call upon his vassals to aid him in times of war and to
collect many dues and taxes, while also drawing revenues from the thriving
commercial city of Paris. Royal officials called “provosts” enforced his royal
laws and collected taxes.
2. The Extension of Royal Power — Louis used the money and
land that he collected to dispense favors and gifts and build up his own
prestige and power. After Louis’ death in 1137, the groundwork had been laid
for the gradual extension of royal power in France, with the monarch a powerful
warlord, landlord, and in control of the thriving city of Paris.
D. Surviving as
Emperor
1. The German Monarchy and the Concordat of Worms — Henry
IV, emperor and king of both Germany and Italy, lost much of the power over the
church and Italy that his father had wielded. The Investiture Conflict
prevented him from regaining it, for he could no longer control the church
hierarchy or depend on bishops to work as government officials. Rebellion from
the German princes and the growing independence of the Italian city-states
further weakened his authority. His son Henry V (r. 1105–1125) faced new
challenges following the Investiture Conflict and its resolution in 1122 with
the Diet of Worms. That settlement invested the monarchy with considerable
power in relation to the church, but did not strengthen the emperor's
relationship to the German princes or the Italian city-states.
No comments:
Post a Comment